Natural & Environmental Resources
We support the informative education of the public as to the benefits and safety of the application and use of pesticides and fertilizers.
We support the issuing of private easements across state and federally owned lands in North Dakota. We support the multi-use management of state and federally owned lands by grazing and haying.
We support an annual easement payment instead of a one-time payment. Payments should reflect current land values.
All new conservation and preservation easements should be in effect only as long as the signer of the easement owns the land. NDFB stands opposed to perpetual easements.
Wildlife and conservation easements should not be perpetual, but should be returned to the landowner when the land is sold and title is transferred.
We believe the North Dakota Department of Environmental Quality should be required to answer permitting requests within 60 days.
The EPA shall serve only in an advisory capacity here in North Dakota.
We oppose the federal regulation of greenhouse gas emissions from our power plants and other sources.
We object to the Environmental Protection Agency's involvement in agriculture and support defunding it.
Pollution regulations, which mandate changes in farming practices, should be based on scientific research that proves a given farming practice, in a particular geography, is in fact causing the pollution and is not caused by other sources and that the proposed regulations will actually reduce pollution.
We believe the North Dakota Department of Environmental Quality and the North Dakota State Water Commission shall not impose regulations that are over burdensome and not based on science.
Hunting and Trapping
We believe hunters should not be able to retrieve downed game on private property without the landowner/operators permission.
We recognize our nations long history of supporting both a person’s right to private property and a person’s right to hunt, therefore we support a statewide database that will allow landowners to designate their private property as either open or closed to hunting.
We support a loss of hunting privileges and/or stiffer financial penalties for people who trespass on private land and fail to observe "No Hunting" and/or "No Trespassing" signs.
We support North Dakota property owners' rights to continue to control all types of hunting, including high-fence hunting, on their property. Property owners or lessees shall decide who hunts their land, and if they prefer, to charge a fee to the hunter for that privilege. We further believe that hunting and recreational rights are land uses, not property title, and therefore, cannot be severed from the surface title of the land.
North Dakota Farm Bureau supports all lands as considered posted unless signed otherwise.
We support the creation of a spring Canada goose season concurrent with the existing spring snow goose season to help alleviate crop depredation.
We oppose any tax revenue and any mitigation money from wind, coal, oil, and gas development as well as impacted cities, counties, school districts and other taxing districts going to non-governmental conservation groups.
We support use of artificial light for enhanced predator control.
We support creating legislation that would require the North Dakota Game and Fish Department and/or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to pay agricultural producers for wildlife depredation of livestock, crops and stored feed. The producer should be paid for losses at market price or contract price.
We believe farmers should be allowed to take the necessary steps, including elimination, to keep wildlife from destroying tangible property. Steps should include allowing transferable depredation tags for antlerless deer be made available to landowners in addition to regular hunting season licenses.
In the event that a producer is found to have destructive wildlife on their property, the North Dakota Game and Fish Department shall be required to make every effort to disperse the wildlife by any means necessary.
We ask the state Game and Fish Department and USDA Wildlife Services Division to provide adequate funding for the predator control division of the Wildlife Services Department for the control of coyotes, beavers, wolves, mountain lions, and other problem animals and birds is a must for ranchers, farmers and others.
Public and Government Owned Lands
We oppose all regulations imposing viewsheds restricting development on private property.
We believe all agricultural land repossessed by government agencies should be put up for sale to private individuals and that no government entity should be allowed to obtain it or be granted easements or acquire existing mineral rights.
We oppose using state conservation funds to purchase land.
We believe that when land is flooded by navigable lakes, and when the water recedes, the ownership should be returned to the people based on the property lines at the time of flooding.
We support a no net gain of government or conservation group-owned land, county by county and state by state.
We believe all state school lands should be sold back in its entirety with no encumbrances to an active agricultural producer.
We believe that government-owned lands should be managed with input from the local private sector.
We oppose the gifting of public lands to any organization; however, we support the sale of federal and state land back to the private sector.
We believe the 12,000 acres of land around Theodore Roosevelt National Park's Elkhorn Ranch site should not be placed on the National Register of Historic Places.
We oppose the allocation of any additional state funds being given to groups/organizations for the purpose of conservation projects, conservation easements and/or land acquisitions.
NRCS should continually update soil profile mapping.
If CRP is released for emergency haying, the Farm Service Agency should be the lead agency and work primarily with agricultural organizations in determining starting dates and rules for haying CRP.
Waste Materials Disposal
We support a no net gain policy on nuclear waste storage.
We believe salt water pipelines should be monitored by flow monitor systems to prevent salt water spills.
Water Control Boards
We oppose the Red River Basin Commission having any taxing authority.
We support the agricultural use of drain tile both as a conservation tool and as a flood mitigation tool. We oppose regulatory policy of damming or blocking drain tile without just compensation.
We believe that before any temporary water permits are issued by the State Water Commission, the landowners and tenants affected must receive written notification of request to submit comments before the temporary permit is to be ruled upon.
We encourage state, counties, and townships to help and not hinder field tiling, since it helps reduce erosion and runoff water, thus improving the overall quality of watersheds.
We support a requirement that all drains must be maintained by landowners and conservation groups so that landowners are not negatively affected.
We support compensation to property owners flooded by state water.
Heritage Fund monies should be used to annually compensate, at fair market cash rent values, those who lose their land to waters of the state.
We oppose any attempt to diminish agriculture and livestock's priority ranking for the waters of the state under the jurisdiction of the State Water Commission.
We call on the state of North Dakota to reclaim our waters where federal wildlife refuges have illegally restricted access to our waters, such as is occurring at Lake Alice and Lake Audubon wildlife refuges, among others. Though the federal government may own the land under the lake, the lake itself belongs to the people of North Dakota and the federal government has no right to restrict its use.
We support landowners/operators ability to run drain tile through Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) unless specified in contract.
We oppose funding for any diversion proposal that includes a dam and reservoir on the Red River south of Fargo.
We support the concept of local control of noxious weeds through county weed boards, city and township officials and recommend noxious weed laws to be enforced and support stiffer penalties for those who make no effort to control noxious weeds in a timely manner on land they own or control, including but not limited to parks, railroads, city, state and federal lands, all roadways and wildlife refuges. If local officials are unable or unwilling to enforce said laws, the North Dakota Ag Commissioner shall be charged to enforce said laws.
We encourage the state of North Dakota, through the office of the Ag Commissioner and NDSU Extension to raise awareness and education of noxious weeds on all lands including state, federal and tribal lands.
We believe Palmer amaranth should be placed on the noxious weed list.
We support the compliance of noxious weed control by all entities that manage or own property and support giving weed boards the authority to control noxious weeds. Any fines collected should go to the weed board for further monitoring and control as provided by state statute.
We believe government agencies should control noxious weeds on land under their control.
We support legislation stating wetlands less than 1 acre cannot be classified as permanent and are not subject to any form of government regulation.
We support an acre for an acre wetland mitigation process.
We propose all farmable land be exempt from wetlands designation and be eligible for drainage.
The state of North Dakota should create a wet land bank on state land for wet land mitigation affordable to agricultural land.
We oppose the federal "wild and scenic" designation for any rivers and their tributaries in North Dakota and oppose wilderness land designation in the state.
We oppose legislation to restrict farming and ranching in favor of threatened and/or endangered species.