We believe the funding mechanism for county and township infrastructure should be strengthened.---ID#: 2425/24

We believe the funding mechanism for county and township infrastructure should be strengthened by prioritizing Strategic Investment and Improvements (SIIF) funding.---ID#: 2631/24

We support a state cost share program to allow for improvements when township/county roads, ditches, or bridges require improvements.---ID#: 2217/24

We support state funding for repairs, maintenance and improvements of county and township roads.---ID#: 2166/26

As a result of any construction, if heavily used township or county roads are damaged, the townships or counties should be fully compensated for the damages to the roads.---ID#: 2333/25

We believe that when hard surfaced roads are resurfaced or top-lifted, the shoulder should also be raised.---ID#: 1545/26

We believe contracts for Department of Transportation overpass rebuilds should have shorter time limits where no frontage roads are on both sides.---ID#: 2735/25

We support any non-licensed agricultural equipment to be exempt from load restrictions.---ID#: 2736/25

We support enhancing North Dakota's load limit laws to promote consistent interstate commerce, enhance competition, and improve access to more competitive markets.---ID#: 2768/26

We believe weight specifications on all state and federal highways should be raised to accommodate modern equipment.---ID#: 2681/24

We believe roadside markers should be only used where needed for safety measures and at the greatest distance possible between, as well as using flexible material when prudent to do so.---ID#: 2577/26

Road signs and road markers should be staggered and a minimum of 15 feet from the white line at the edge of the road to allow passage of wide equipment.---ID#: 2610/26

We support the use of a unified rural road labeling system.---ID#: 2135/26

We oppose the installation of barrier fences in the median of the divided highways in North Dakota and support the removal of said fences.---ID#: 2656/24